Notes

Publishers Note

When I told U.G. that I wanted to publish a book containing his discussions, he said that I could go ahead and do it only as a business venture. ‘Make money if that is what is your motive. But if you think it will help you in any way or anyone else on their spiritual path, you are miserably mistaken. I have no illusions about it at all,’ said U.G. Apart from my mundane motives which are the ‘real’ ones according to U.G., I felt that this man should be known widely for whatever he is. In spite of his vehement assertion that he has no message for mankind, I still feel that what he says is like a ‘statutory warning’ printed on a pack of cigarettes. It is up to you to heed it. If you do not like what he says it may be because he does not tell you what you want to hear.

Publisher.

He Became UG

Be There

Light !

Said God

And

There

Was

Total

Black out.

Be there

Peace !

Said God

And

There

Were

World Wars.

Be there

Order !

Said God

And

There

Was

Utter Chaos.

Dismayed

Disillusioned

God said

Be there

No God !

And

Instantly

He

Became

UG !

K. Chandrasekhar.

There is no teaching of mine, and never shall be one. ‘Teaching’ is not the word for it. A teaching implies a method or a system, a technique or a new way of thinking to be applied in order to bring about a transformation in your way of life. What I am saying is outside the field of teachability; it is simply a description of the way I am functioning. It is just a description of the natural state of man - this is the way you, stripped of the machinations of thought, are also functioning.

The natural state is not the state of a self-realised God-realised man, it is not a thing to be achieved or attained, it is not a thing to be willed into existence; it is there - it is the living state. This state is just the functional activity of life. By ‘life’ I do not mean something abstract; it is the life of the senses, functioning naturally without the interference of thought. Thought is an interloper, which thrusts itself into the affairs of the senses. It has a profit motive: thought directs the activity of the senses to get something out of them, and uses them to give continuity to itself.

Your natural state has no relationship whatsoever with the religious states of bliss, beatitude and ecstasy; they lie within the field of experience. Those who have led man on his search for religiousness throughout the centuries have perhaps experienced those religious states. So can you. They are thought-induced states of being, and as they come, so do they go. Krishna Consciousness, Buddha Consciousness, Christ Consciousness, or what have you, are all trips in the wrong direction: they are all within the field of time. The timeless can never be experienced, can never be grasped, contained, much less given expression to, by any man. That beaten track will lead you nowhere. There is no oasis situated yonder; you are stuck with the mirage.

A Note at the Beginning

If you think that you can read and understand this book, you can be quite off the mark. “Anybody who comes and listens to me and tries to understand what I am trying to put across is wasting his time because there is no way you can listen to anything without interpretation,” says U.G. Krishnamurthy.

According to him, when we leave the ‘sense of hearing’ alone, all that is there is the vibration of sounds. These vibrations are picked up by the eardrum, transferred to the nerves which run to the brain, and are interpreted according to what he calls, ‘our reference point’. Thus we hear our own translations of the vibrations. Says U.G., “That is all right for a relationship with someone on the level of, ‘Here is some money, give me a half kilo of carrots’ - but that is the limit of your relationship, of your communication with anybody.”

Whether you agree or not with all that he says, it is really worth a try to listen to him. The words that come out of him are like grenades lobbed into our ‘reference point’ threatening to uproot everything that we thought the way it is. His statements are devastating, more so to people who have heard J. Krishnamurthy, Osho Rajneesh and others who are nurtured in a religious atmosphere.

U.G. can also discuss quantum physics and black holes and eros and thanatos. U.G. says, “I do not claim to have a special insight into the nature of things or that I understand the workings of nature more than anybody else. But this is what I have discovered for myself. I do not care whether you accept what I am saying or not. It stands or falls by itself.” His statements have a solid ring of authenticity and seem to spring from a source other than ‘thinking’. What he says shakes the very foundation of human thought. It is another matter that his remarks on themes like God, love, enlightenment, mind, meditation, death and reincarnation and such matters often smack of blasphemy and border on heresy.

The story of U.G. Krishnamurthy has all the ingredients of a thriller. One episode in his life leads to another without any systematic sequence. When he reached the age of forty-nine, there was a sudden turn of events. Something happened to him which he called a ‘calamity’ (to help our understanding), when he stumbled upon a ‘natural state’, wherein in his words, “Everything that man had said, felt, or seen, in fact, the whole heritage of mankind, was thrown out of my system.”

But according to U.G., as he is widely known, this was not what he had desired. He was looking for a spiritual dreamland waxed eloquent by the holy men - frauds as well as genuine. The religious atmosphere was part of his background. U.G. was born in 1918 into a middle-class Brahmin family in Andhra Pradesh. His mother died soon after giving birth to him and on her deathbed said her child was cut out for something “immeasurably high”. U.G.'s grandfather took her words seriously and groomed him in an ascetic atmosphere.

A small episode, however, was a turning point in U.G.'s life. His grandfather was once meditating early in the morning when he was disturbed by the cries of a child. The old man was so angry that he beat the child black and blue. The incongruity and brutality of the scene had a traumatic impact on the tender sensibilities of U.G. He said to himself, “If this is what meditation is about, it is worthless.” He threw away his sacred thread and threatened to walk out of the house.

U.G.'s life thereafter was an experiment with truth. An insatiable hunger overtook him to find out whether there was anything behind the abstract pronouncements of the so-called spiritual men. He met various masters including J. Krishnamurthi and Ramana Maharshi and practiced traditional meditations. He exhausted every means possible to reach the ‘promised land’ and at the end of it was bereft of hope and thrown into utter despair.

On his forty-ninth birthday he was sitting on a bench overlooking the green valley and rugged peaks of Oberland in Switzerland. It suddenly occurred to him, “I have searched everywhere to find an answer to my question, ‘Is there enlightenment?’ but I have never questioned the search itself. Because I have assumed that enlightenment exists, I have had to search, and it is the search itself which has been choking me and keeping me out of my natural state.”

He said to himself, “There is no such thing as spiritual or psychological enlightenment because there is no such thing as spirit or psyche at all. I have been a damn fool all my life, searching for something which does not exist. My search is at an end.”

His voracious hunger to find out the fairyland promised by the prophets and spiritual masters had burnt itself out. The occurrence had telling effects on his body. Many physical changes took place within him which bewildered the medical men and friends around him. His life thereafter became one in which there was no thought for the morrow nor grief over the past. According to U.G., grief and joy are the realms of mind.

The body is interested in neither. Its only interest is in surviving the day-to-day challenges it encounters from moment to moment.

U.G.'s statements are enigmatic and if heard or read outside of his presence can be construed as either a product of a supreme intellect or a madman's litany. His words defy the logical framework with which we are accustomed. U.G. dismisses the possibility of any experience except through knowledge. According to him, it is the knowledge which creates the experience, and the experience which strengthens the knowledge. Knowledge does not have any metaphysical or epistemological overtones. It is simply that something is a ‘chair’ or a ‘table’ or that some sensation is either pleasurable or painful. In fact, even the process of recognition and naming of something is part of knowledge. The total operation is known as thinking.

What distinguishes us from U.G. is that this knowledge which is operating through the process of thinking is in a declutched state in U.G., while there is a constant undercurrent of thinking activity within us whether we like it or not. Our mind is constantly churning out thought after thought in various shapes, colors and sizes. U.G. says that it is through this constant thinking that we are maintaining the continuity of what we call the ‘I’ or ‘self’.

In U.G. the continuity of thought has been snapped. Thoughts come to him in a disjointed manner without any link-up. He ‘thinks’ only when there is a demand for experience. Otherwise, what there is is only the simple activity of the senses - the stimulus and response continuum. Since it is the continuous thought-activity that gives the illusion of the ‘self’ or ‘I’, there is no feeling of ‘self’ or ‘I’ within him.

U.G. says the stranglehold on the physical organism of what is called knowledge has the potency of millions of years. The knowledge which operates in the form of thought has set up a parallel empire of its own in contradistinction to the ways of nature or whatever one wants to call it. But the ‘thought’ subtly knows its ephemeral nature and the fear of its fleeting existence propels it to erect a marvellous structure of culture, civilization, religion, politics, the various institutions and values that govern our lives and, in fact, everything that one can conceive of.

All these facets of human life are nothing but props through which the ‘thought’ tries to enthrone itself in permanence. In other words, what we call ‘I’ or ‘you’ is a thought, seeking permanence in innumerable activities. U.G. says only when, by some miracle or strange chance, the living organism is freed from the stranglehold of the empire created by thought, can the body with its extraordinary intelligence free the human being to be in the ‘natural state’.

But, according to U.G., one cannot use one's volition or go through any rigorous discipline to come into the natural state. Such a state is beyond the field of experience. U.G. often describes his situation thus: “How did it all happen? I don't know. What is it that has happened? I don't know. Has anything happened at all?” He says that what has happened to him is such that it cannot be shared by anybody, that the natural state cannot be expressed or contained through thought. Therefore, no communication is possible and no dialogue is necessary.

What use is the so-called ‘natural state’ to people who are not functioning in it? The question after all is asked from a non-natural state perspective by mortals who are looking for a panacea to all their problems. Peace and happiness are what we are all after and U.G.'s ‘natural state’ offers us no experience of anything like it. So what we are left with are our points of view about the person, depending on our prejudices and conditioning. Call him a fraud or a freak of nature but once you are anywhere near the vortex of U.G.'s existential presence you are left dumbfounded. Your expectations and opinions are shattered. You are left to wonder as to what is the source from which his statements spring. Beneath his apparent human form there lies something which defies description.

Frank Noronha

21/88 Lodi Colony

New Delhi